KbQV – The High Costs of a Suicide Economy

Max and Stacy in the market talking about the inefficient American economy that sends its jobs to China while increasing the costs of Iraq by six times.

Duration : 0:4:25


[youtube 72N0a6hz2rQ]

25 Responses to “KbQV – The High Costs of a Suicide Economy”

  1. daniel987878 on July 7th, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    In the real world …
    In the real world you need to defend the nation 100%. You cant go out empire building though and wasting your scarce resources on building weapons and debasing the nation’s economy.

    The military has to be financed by increasing taxation which slows the economy or borrowing from your enemies which gives them an advantage and is a true sign of weakness.

  2. I stand by my …
    I stand by my statements and I’m sure you feel the same about yours. So we disagree. No sense beating a dead horse.

    Military spending is needed as it is still a real world and not everyone abides by the same rules. Every country has its military, and spends for it according to their needs and means. %of GDP is perhaps the best way to show acuurately how much of a countries wealth is spent on military. NATO uses % of GDP for military expenditures for each of its members.

  3. daniel987878 on July 7th, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    You like to compare …
    You like to compare one years expenses against another in terms of as a % of GDP. Ever heard of the cumulative costs of wasteful military spending? This is eroding the country’s productivity as production is diverted to making bombs instead of other necesary spending year on year. You should do the same with yearly subprime mortgage lending as a % of GDP and it is less than 4%.

    Economics is simple. Spend more than your revenue for extended periods of time and you will end up with problems.

  4. daniel987878 on July 7th, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    Your telling me my …
    Your telling me my argument does not hold water and you are on record calling Max Keiser an ignoramus. This guy predicted this crisis and is a former wall street broker. Your argument is not too credible either then is it?

    My viewpoint is that empire building isnt exactly worth investing in on economic or moral grounds, especially if it is deficit financed. National defence is very important though.

    All this socialism and big government bullshit is the problem. So much waste.

  5. Yes subprime …
    Yes subprime lending is lending allowed by our congress to people who could not afford to by a house otherwise. As a result the “trillions” of dollars in subprime morgages and its derivitives, collapsed when the market was oversold and people who couldn’t afford what they bought and began defaulting on their loans.

    The policies began during the 1990s.

    But again, military expenditures were 5.2% of GDP in 1990 and are currently at 4.0.

    Your argument does not hold water.

  6. Government revenues …
    Government revenues as % of GDP. 2007-20.0%,1991-22.3%, 1968-20.5%. US government revenues have remained between a high of 23.5% and a low of 17.2% since 1962. Current revenue is 20.00%.

    As you know Social security and medicare that comprise the largest % of the US government is not productive either.

    And no, homeland security is a combination of former departments in the US that were combined. They are not “military”.

  7. daniel987878 on July 7th, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    It is a bit …
    It is a bit misleading to compare military expenditures to GDP because GDP is the final value of all goods and services in the country. Since the government pays for the military a more relevant measure is to compare military expenditures to government revenue. if you take into account homeland security, the military budget and all the rest its like 80% of tax revenue. as you know the military is not productive it is just designed to kill. Its mostly waste if your sending it to the Middle east.

  8. daniel987878 on July 7th, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    The military …
    The military expenditures are a fundamental pillar of the fiscal overextension and malinvestment which caused this crisis. Equally responsible for this crisis are derivatives markets, credit excesses including leverage and subprime lending.

    The current situation the US finds itself is the result of years of misguided policy which were only viable in years past as the US squandered its wealth and dominance. It appears the tipping point may have been reached.

  9. I agree with you …
    I agree with you that the current crisis is due to Congressional incompetance, greedy Investment firms, and a lack of control over the borrowing system.

    But the bottom line is that the military is less of a factor than during most previous periods of peace.

    My figures are from the Congressional Research Service July 2008, using 2008 dollars and % of GDP. (As requested by Congress)

  10. Again I …
    Again I respectfully disagree with you. The crisis is the result of the subprime mortgages, and not the national debt. Our national debt is huge in dollar amounts yet still relitively small(moderate) in comparison to GDP (Gross Domestic Product). I believe the US (as far as Debt, as a part of GDP) is rated at #59 in the world following countries such as England, France, etc.

    Current military expenditures,(including both wars) are 4.2% of GDP.Gulf war 1, was 4.6%, Vietnam 9.6, Korea 13.2.

  11. daniel987878 on July 7th, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    The current crisis …
    The current crisis goes beyond sub-prime mortgages. This is common knowledge now. The crisis initially was named the sub-prime mortgage crisis but now its just referred to as the credit crisis. Credit is debt.

    In the initial phases of the crisis the most at risk were sub prime borrowers so they came into trouble first but now the whole system is obviously threatened and this episode is systemic.

    The problem comes down to debt and malinvestment. The deficit financed military is a contributor.

  12. I would …
    I would respectfully disagree with you. The reason the economy is in such dire straights is because of the subprime mortgage crisis and not the war in Iraq and Afganistan.

    While this person is predicting doom and gloom because of the war.

    While I realize there is an economic crisis, I also realize the causes of it.

    The current cost of the US military (including both wars in Iraq and Afganistan) are at a historical low as a % of GDP.

  13. daniel987878 on July 7th, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    You called this guy …
    You called this guy an ignoramus even though he predicted the current predicament the US finds itself in.

  14. Apparently you are …
    Apparently you are not current with why the economy is tanking and want to revert back to the old its Cheney and Bush. (you seem incapable of getting past that thought)If there’s anyone who’s psycho its people who don’t understand whats happening yet make comments as if they do. As for “neocon little trolls”, I didn’t play with dolls when I was growing up. Sounds like your department

  15. How is it possible …
    How is it possible that you could give this video a negative comment 2 years ago and then come back and do so again 3 weeks ago despite the great changes that have happened in America in the last two years. What a psycho you are.
    Amazing how our economy is tanking and neocon little trolls like you still lurk about regurgitating the same all over the place. off.

  16. ….con’t, but is …
    ….con’t, but is far from bankrupting the US economy. I believe this person is just rambling on about “Halliburton” because it is associated with “Cheney” (Darth Vader). If it wasn’t he would find another subject to talk about

  17. The comments focus …
    The comments focus on Halliburton and the soldiers in Iraq as why the economy is going in the tank. Halliburton built the infrastructure needed for US troops in Iraq as well as providing services to the troops that free them to do what they do best. While4 some workers for Halliburton or numerous sub contractors do make good money, many are paid minimum wage by US standards. The work they do is essential. And every war has had thier “Halliburtons”. Do they make money? I’m sure, ….con’t

  18. u just too dumb to …
    u just too dumb to understand even when they speak english. perhaps dog language serve u better. hahahhahaa

  19. Continuing to …
    Continuing to resort to infantile remarks, doesn’t change the fact you are plainly not mentally mature enough as yet to understand the videos message. Goodbye.

  20. Calling me names …
    Calling me names doesn’t change the fact you’re a know all, and who’s not as clever as you think you are.

  21. Wow your such a …
    Wow your such a know all, maybe you should work on Wall St, hell, you should take over the fed.

  22. 1st of all, this …
    1st of all, this guys really smart, but he too like all generally well meaning ppl are blind to the class interests. Now, SOME ppl are making a fortune with Iraq, and SOME OTHER ppl are losing their fortune with the economy. The investor class is profiting both ways by making the national work force cheaper by outsourcing to china and from charging overprise in Iraq. Usually u have the same ppl deciding about wars and making that profit. So someone always wins.

  23. akshaytandon on July 7th, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    wow.. all three of …
    wow.. all three of you are really stupid!

  24. Gerry.. explain …
    Gerry.. explain yourself… your negative comment is just negative but I have no idea what exactly you are reffering to. Some good point made in the video.

  25. HUH, what the …
    HUH, what the is this nut talking about. What an ignoramis.

Leave a Reply